<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO Tools</title>
	<link>http://seotools.pi.edu</link>
	<description>Gnosis Arts Multimedia Communications LLC &#124; SEO Tools</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Traffic Surfing with Google Trends</title>
		<link>http://seotools.pi.edu/2008/05/02/traffic-surfing-with-google-trends/</link>
		<comments>http://seotools.pi.edu/2008/05/02/traffic-surfing-with-google-trends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gnosisarts</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic Generation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seotools.pi.edu/2008/05/02/traffic-surfing-with-google-trends/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Trends shows the top 100 searches for a given day. You can use Google Trends to help generate traffic to a site by writing a quality article using one of these high-volume search terms. This is a natural (organic) way of generating traffic that we at Gnosis Arts like to call "traffic surfing."
For example, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.google.com/trends/" rel="nofollow">Google Trends</a> shows the top 100 searches for a given day. You can use Google Trends to help generate traffic to a site by writing a quality article using one of these high-volume search terms. This is a natural (organic) way of generating traffic that we at Gnosis Arts like to call "traffic surfing."</p>
<p>For example, last month I was looking through Google Trends and found out that the term "spitzer's girl" was among the most searched terms. It was obvious why: at the time, the Eliot Spitzer sex scandal was making headline news in just about every media pipeline in the nation. So, I used this traffic trend to my advantage. I wrote a unique, quality editorial about the Spitzer scandal, titled the editorial "spitzer girl," and then posted the story on <a href="http://www.gnosisarts.com/nj-journalism-copywriting.html">my website's news page</a>. Then, I submitted the article to digg.com - a popular social media site.</p>
<p>After about a week, the page on which the editorial resided jumped two Page Rank points. After about another week, the page was raking on page 6 in Google. Now, though this is not a top 30 ranking, it is still quite impressive nonetheless. What it shows is that Google pays close attention to newsworthy, relevant and somewhat unique content, and rewards such sites accordingly. I also, noticed modest increases in overall traffic to the site.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fseotools.pi.edu%2F2008%2F05%2F02%2Ftraffic-surfing-with-google-trends%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Traffic+Surfing+with+Google+Trends';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seotools.pi.edu/2008/05/02/traffic-surfing-with-google-trends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domain Name Server (DNS) and Internet Protocol (IP) Optimization</title>
		<link>http://seotools.pi.edu/2008/04/26/domain-name-server-dns-and-internet-protocol-ip-optimization/</link>
		<comments>http://seotools.pi.edu/2008/04/26/domain-name-server-dns-and-internet-protocol-ip-optimization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 22:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gnosisarts</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[DNS/IP Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dns server]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ip]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seotools.pi.edu/2008/04/26/domain-name-server-dns-and-internet-protocol-ip-optimization/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part of good search engine optimization (SEO) involves domain name server and Internet Protocol optimization. DNS/IP problems can affect the performance of your website. Moreover, there is some evidence to support the claim that the major search engines (especially Google) utilize DNS/IP quality as part of their Quality Score calculations. Issues such as load time, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of good <strong><a href="http://www.gnosisarts.com/search-engine-optimization-marketing.html">search engine optimization</a></strong> (SEO) involves domain name server and Internet Protocol optimization. DNS/IP problems can affect the performance of your website. Moreover, there is some evidence to support the claim that the major search engines (especially Google) utilize DNS/IP quality as part of their Quality Score calculations. Issues such as load time, server failure, 503 HTTP Header errors, and bad IP neighborhoods can have a negative impact on Page Rank (PR). And, since Page Rank is a contributing factor in search engine ranking position (SERP) it pays to have a basic understanding of DNS/IP problems and their resolution. </p>
<p><strong>What Is a DNS Server?</strong><br />
DNS server stands for “Domain Name System" server. This is the actual URL name of the server which hosts your individual domain. When someone types in your URL in their browser’s address bar, the browser begins to look for the name of the server on which your URL is hosted. Think of a DNS as the house out in cyberspace where your URL or domain lives. The browser interacts with the DNS-house, knocking on its door, if you will, when someone tries to call up your website.</p>
<p><strong>What Is an IP?</strong><br />
An IP stands for “Internet Protocol”. This is a set of procedures or commands that the browser uses to communicate with the DNS to get it to “open the front door” and serve up the applicable web pages out into the WWW. An <em><strong>IP address</strong></em> is a decimal or hexadecimal number inside of which a website is encoded. The IP address contains the instructions - or the DNA - of a particular website.</p>
<p>Understanding IP and DNS in detail is irrelevant for the purposes of this blog article. However, what <em>is</em> important to understand is that one DNS-house can consist of many IP addresses, just as one physical house can have member family members living within it.</p>
<p>A simple analogy will help make clear the implications of DNS and IP problema. If, for example, the family members (the IP addresses) are fighting with or otherwise harming one another; or, if the house in which they live is falling apart (the DNS), then that family’s reputation in the community at large (its search engine Quality, Trust and Authority Scores) will suffer. Opportunities for advancement (SERP promotion) will be hindered, and rehabilitation of the family (website optimization) will be much more difficult.</p>
<p><strong>Why Is DNS/IP Optimization Important?</strong><br />
Though not at first apparent, as we have shown, DNS/IP issues do have a bearing on website promotion and optimization. If the DNS at which your URL resides has problems, this not only can slow or completely block your website from loading, but can negatively affect PR and SERP. As a general rule, slow load times or frequent header errors will lower your Quality Score. A lower Quality Score means lower PR and lower rankings.</p>
<p>IP problems can also negatively affect rankings. It is important to note that, in the eyes of the search engines, your unique IP address is, unfortunately or fortunately, irrevocably associated with <em>all</em> the other IP addresses residing at that DNS. If one or more of those other IP addresses have been blacklisted, penalized or banned by one of the search engines, this can create problems for you. Your IP address - and thus your website - can be negatively associated with this “bad neighborhood,” despite the fact that yours is a quality site; and, it can take you much longer to get pages indexed and ranked.</p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote><p><img width="200" src="http://gnosisarts.com/forum/EECore1.6.2/images/uploads/DSC00475_thumb.jpg" alt="image" height="200" /></p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p><em>Is your DNS a peaceful home? Is your IP address in a good neighborhood?</em><br />
Photo By <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.answerhost.com/mmc/">MMC Designs LLC</a></p>
<p><strong>How Do I Optimize the DNS and IP?</strong><br />
In light of the preceeding, the goal of DNS optimization will be to detect and correct any DNS errors as they arise. Time To Load (TTL) problems, slow or absent server response, overloaded DNS traffic, insufficient bandwith. All these issues can be measured, detected and remedied for maximum optimization. There are many good resources out there if you want to learn about DNS optimization. Two good sites are <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.pingdom.com/">Pingdom</a> and <a rel="nofollow" href="http://opendns.com/">OpenDNS</a>. These sites have tools to help you diagnose and resolve common DNS problems.</p>
<p>Additionally, optimizing IP issues will involve getting a site out of a “bad neighborhood” and moving it into a “good neighborhood” - that is, a company of websites that have high Quality, Authority and Trust Scores. The idea of a good cyber-neighborhood is pretty intuitive actually, and parallels real life: “Bad company corrupts good morals,” goes the old saw. <a rel="nofollow" href="http://seomoz.org/">SEOMoz</a> and <a rel="nofollow" href="http://webconfs.com/">Webconfs</a> have a good IP/DNS tools for this.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fseotools.pi.edu%2F2008%2F04%2F26%2Fdomain-name-server-dns-and-internet-protocol-ip-optimization%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Domain+Name+Server+%28DNS%29+and+Internet+Protocol+%28IP%29+Optimization';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seotools.pi.edu/2008/04/26/domain-name-server-dns-and-internet-protocol-ip-optimization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The TLD Debate Revisited</title>
		<link>http://seotools.pi.edu/2008/04/19/the-tld-debate-revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://seotools.pi.edu/2008/04/19/the-tld-debate-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gnosisarts</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Domain/URL Optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seotools.pi.edu/2008/04/19/the-tld-debate-revisited/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do Search Engines Give Preference to Certain TLDs (Top Level Domains) Than Others?
This question has been circulating around SEO circles for some time now. SEOs are always looking for “white hat” methods to improve search engine rank placement (SERP), and so naturally one of the questions we ask concerns preferential treatment of TLDs. The general [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><strong>Do Search Engines Give Preference to Certain TLDs (Top Level Domains) Than Others?</strong></h2>
<p>This question has been circulating around SEO circles for some time now. SEOs are always looking for “white hat” methods to improve search engine rank placement (SERP), and so naturally one of the questions we ask concerns preferential treatment of TLDs. The general consensus among SEO professionals is that the search engines (SEs for short) do <strong>not</strong> grant any special treatment to various TLDs. That is, they do not give certain TLDs a “head start” by granting more intrinsic trust or authority to them.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, I’m not wholly convinced of that, and I have learned the scientific value of never simply taking anyone’s word for things. In the absence of hard data, I find that many claims of members of the “SEO Intelligentsia” are simply unfounded and do not hold up under rigorous, methodical experimentation.</p>
<p>So, I decided to conduct my own experiment. I purchased six different domains covering what I considered at the time to be the top four TLDs: .com, .org, .net and .us. In order to control for all variables except the TLD choice, I took the following steps:</p>
<ul>
<li>I purchased all the domains at the same time and registered them all with the same hosting company</li>
<li>I chose the same pattern for all the domains, ensuring that each of the keywords contained therein received roughly the same amounts of search volume</li>
<li>I parked all the domains at the same parking host</li>
<li>I did the same amount of linkbuilding on all of them, which was to submit each to only <strong>one</strong> popular social bookmarking site</li>
<li>I ensured that the parking pages of each site contained roughly the same amount of outbound links</li>
</ul>
<p>And that was it. I did no further optimization on any of the domains. Then, I left them alone and forgot about them. The domains selected were:</p>
<ol>
<li>gamusic[dot]org</li>
<li>gamusic[dot]us</li>
<li>gapoetry[dot]org</li>
<li>gapoetry[dot]us</li>
<li>gapoetry[dot]net</li>
<li>gawriting[dot]com</li>
</ol>
<p>I feel that I should say that, going in, my assumption was that, if there were any SE TLD preference at all, it would be given to the .us. My rationale for this was that many government agencies were beginning to use the .us in conjunction with the .gov in the URLs. And, since I had conclusively demonstrated in other experiments that .gov and .edu TLDs possess more intrinsic authority and trust that other TLDs, I reasoned that this might be a case of trust by association.</p>
<p><strong>So Which TLD(s) Performed Better?</strong></p>
<p>Well, initially I felt that my original hypothesis - that the .us TLD would be granted some SE “brownie points” - seemed to hold true. I noticed about two weeks after parking the domains that the .us was the only one which recorded at PageRank (PR) of 1; all the others were either zero, or still greyed out.</p>
<p>I redently removed all the domains from their parking lots and moved them back to my original host server. The domains had been parked for about five months now, and I decided I no longer liked the parking company. When I went to remove them, I was startled at what I found.</p>
<p>The .net domain outscored the others - and not by one or two PR points - but by three or four! <em>Gapoetry.net was now recording a PR of 4</em>, while the other domains reported no change at all!</p>
<p>Of course I thought this rather strange. I began to ask myself what factor(s) were responsible for the substantial difference in PR. Since the only two variables not controlled for were back links and traffic, I started with these. To my amazement, I found that gapoetry.net had the same one or two backlinks it did when I started. Even more interesting was that one of the .orgs had <em>one more</em> backlink that the .net, but still reported no change in PR!</p>
<p>Next I looked at traffic reports. I was again surprised. None of the sites received even a modicum of real traffic. In fact, the Alexa and Compete people counts could not even be collected because the sites received so few visitors. Thus, traffic could not have been a factor.</p>
<p>Then, I considered IP address neighborhoods. Nope, this could not have been a determining factor, either; all domains were parked at the same DNS server locations.</p>
<p>What about content? Nope. All domains had similar parking page templates (templates which were assigned by the parking host and which could only be very minimally customized). All parked pages consisted of roughly the same amount of moderately-keyword-optimized text.</p>
<p>Additionally, all domains had virtually <em>the same amount of outbound links.</em> Furthermore, all the outbound links went to the same repository of sponsored ads, so the dramatic PR difference certainly could not have been attributed to outbound link destination.</p>
<p>Indexing? Well, of the sites that were actually indexed by the SEs, all were indexed at roughly the same time. And domain age could not have been a factor, as all domains were conceived and registered on precisely the same day and at precisely the same time.</p>
<p><strong>So, Which TLD Got Preference?</strong><br />
Scientifically speaking, the experiment would have to be repeated a statistically significant number of times in order to conclusively state that the .net TLD received any preferential treatment by the SEs. However, the results are interesting and surprising, nonetheless. In the best traditions of science, the results show that which is not-intuitive: that .nets may be granted some degree of intrinsic trust and/or authority which the others are not. It may not be due to any conscious coding on the part of the algorithm programmers, of course. However, there may be some inherent code in the algorithms which cause them, for whatever reason, to favor the .nets.</p>
<p><strong>A Few Additional Notes</strong><br />
Additionally, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.net" rel="nofollow">according to Wikipedia</a>, the .net TLD is the third most popular TLD behind .com and .de. And according to domain data we collected at the <a href="http://www.gnosisarts.com/new-fine-arts-lab.html" title="New Fine Arts Lab">New Fine Arts Lab</a>, the number of sites with the top four TLDs is as follows:</p>
<ol>
<li>.com = 13.22 billion sites</li>
<li>.org = 1.41 billion</li>
<li>.us = 1.53 million</li>
<li>.net = 1.78 billion</li>
<li>.de = 1.37 billion</li>
</ol>
<p><em>(source: Google)</em><br />
Also, we collected some data on domain name appraisal values. We found that .coms generally go for the highest average prices when sold. Right behind them are the .nets. Might there be some correlation between the “hidden hand of the market” (to use Adam Smith’s phrase) and the trust/authority scores of a domain?</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fseotools.pi.edu%2F2008%2F04%2F19%2Fthe-tld-debate-revisited%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'The+TLD+Debate+Revisited';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seotools.pi.edu/2008/04/19/the-tld-debate-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
